This is a documentation for Board Game Arena: play board games online !

Diferenzas entre revisións de «Moderationpolicy»

De Board Game Arena
Saltar ata a navegación Saltar á procura
Liña 117: Liña 117:
  | Exploit a known bug during a game
  | Exploit a known bug during a game
  | The bug must have been reported in the forum, and an exact reference to this bug must be in the report, with the table id and the move number. Minor bugs that can be considered as "variants" are NOT concerned (ex: pick 4 cards instead of 3). Bugs that violate the spirit of the game are concerned.
  | The bug must have been reported in the forum, and an exact reference to this bug must be in the report, with the table id and the move number. Minor bugs that can be considered as "variants" are NOT concerned (ex: pick 4 cards instead of 3). Bugs that violate the spirit of the game are concerned.
  | No penalty applies: if there is a bug that has been widely used for a game, a global ELO reset will be done.  
  | No penalty applies: if there is a bug that has been widely used for a game, a global ELO reset (or an ELO adjustment for players who exploited the bug) will be done.  
  |-
  |-
  ! Donnée 1A
  ! Donnée 1A

Revisión como estaba o 30 de maio de 2013 ás 11:21

General rules

Beyond a Reasonable Doubt

In case there is a any possible doubt, a player should be considered not guilty.

Moderators independance

Moderators must not process reports if they know the protagonists (author or targeted player). Playing online with the protagonist does not mean to "know" them. "Know" means: know them personally or playing with them online very regularly.

Appeal

Players has the right to appeal against the moderation decision, by forwarding received moderation email to "contact@boardgamearena.com".

They MUST explain in the email why the moderator did not respect the BGA moderation policy. If the explanation is not convincing, the email will be ignored. If the player is obviously guilty and if the moderation policy hasn't been violated, BGA admins will double the penalties.

Penalty grid

Moderators should respect the penalties grid as much as possible. However, they have the right to adjust the penalty depending on the gravity of the case. The following situation can lead moderators to increase the penalties: _ the player has been reported several time for the same type of case. _ the player wrong action can be obviously qualified by one or several of the following terms: racism, xenophobia, homophobia, sexism, and as a rule of thumb any type of discrimination against a particular category of people. _ on case there is a provocation, the penalty may be be reduced a little, and the author of the provocation may have a warning BUT, as everyone should keep quiet and polite even if there are provoked, this is a moderator choice.

Relapse

In case there is a relapse, the penalty increases exponentially.

This is the moderator job to determine the right penalty to apply in this case, considering the fact that the player has been warned by a first penalty.

Moderators should consider there is a relapse only if the new wrong action occurs AFTER the previous penalty has been applied and the associated moderation email has been sent.

Considering it's a lot of work to analyze reports about players who do the same action again and again, the "ban forever" penalty can be applied to any case if the player relapses.

Special urgency ban procedure

Whatever the case type, moderators has the right to ban a player from the website (forever) if this player set up a situation that is out of control and must be stopped within hours. This special procedure should only be used if there is an immediate danger for the community (ex: vandalism, flow of insults, massive spam, ...).

About private jokes

If a wrong action happened in a private circle (ex: at a game table, with no spectators), and if none of the present players reported the action, the moderator must consider this was a "private joke" and must not apply any penalty. In the contrary, if the wrong action is public (ex: post/comment on the wall), the moderator may consider this as a wrong action even if there is no report.

Prescription

For operational reason, a report that is older than 2 weeks may be closed by moderators because it is too old.

Player profile influence

The player profile IS taken into account to determine if the player is guilty or not guilty. Moderators gives more credit to players with a good profile than the other.

The player profile is NOT taken into account when choosing the penalty if the player is found guilty.

Good profile elements are:

  • A good thumb up / thumb down ratio.
  • Player is registered since a long time / has a lot of games player.
  • Players is involved in the website (ex: realized translations).
  • Player is supporting BGA (member of the club).

Incomplete reports

Analyzing reports takes a lot of time, and many reports are received. If any needed information is missing in the report, moderators may (and most of the time, should) close the report.

Penalty grid

Titre
Category Case type Details Standard penalty
Insults Insults during a game, on table chat Must be present in the report: table ID, and the insults terms. If the insult is not in English, or if the insult is not obvious, the report author must specify why this is insulting. Devilkin 3 days for small insults and insanity, Devilkin 30 days for real insults. Smaller penalty (ex: 1 day) can be applied if this was obviously a stupid joke. In any case: the player should be warn that this is the last warning before ban.
Insults Insults on general chat Must be present in the report: the insult terms. If the insult is not in English, or if the insult is not obvious, the report author must specify why this is insulting. Devilkin 30 days for small insults and insanity, Devilkin forever for real insults. In any case: the player should be warn that this is the last warning before ban.
Insults Insults on public space (wall, forum, comments...) Must be present in the report: where to find the insult, the insult terms. If the insult is not in English, or if the insult is not obvious, the report author must specify why this is insulting. Devilkin 3 days for small insults and insanity, Devilkin 30 days for real insults. Smaller penalty (ex: 1 day) can be applied if this was obviously a stupid joke. In any case: the player should be warn that this is the last warning before ban.
Aggressive attitude Aggressive attitude during a game: can't wait the other player, provocation, ... As a rule of thumb: as long as there is no insult, this is not an issue: thumb down are the solution. BUT, if the player is really borderline and should be warned, a moderation action is needed. -1 to -10 reputation penalty. Moderators should explain that this is a small warning, and that a change of attitude is needed.
Avatar Inappropriate avatar: porn, extreme violence, advertising... If needed, report author should explain why this is inappropriate. Avatar is really inappropriate in 3 cases:

1°) It can hurt underage players (porn, extreme violence) 2°) This is advertisement / this violate some intellectual property 3°) The avatar contains a reference that discriminate a group of people (ex: nazi cross)

Avatar immediate removal + Devilkin 3 days to devilkin forever depending on the gravity. In any case: the player should be warn that this is the last warning before ban. If the player obviously don't measure the meaning of the avatar, the penalty can be reduced.
Avatar Inappropriate username If needed, report author should explain why this is inappropriate. Username are inappropriate when this is obviously an insult for many people. Moderators shouldn't moderate a username that is insulting by accident in a language that is not widely used on BGA. Ban from the website. Moderators should explain that the player is welcome with another username on BGA. Note that if the player has a long seniority on BGA (=many games played), moderators should be very cautious on the case: if no one notice the username until now, it is probably not inappropriate.
Table description Inappropriate table description If needed, report author should explain why this is inappropriate. Table description is inappropriate when it contains insults, insanity, or tend to discriminate a group of people. Devilkin 3 days for small insults and insanity, Devilkin 30 days for real insults. Smaller penalty (ex: 1 day) can be applied if this was obviously a stupid joke. In any case: the player should be warn that this is the last warning before ban.
Kingmaking Kingmaking action during a game The report must contains the table id, the exact move number, and the exact explanation why this is a kingmaking action. To declare a player guilty, the player must have played an obvious move against his own interest, and it have to be a good player (clues: his ELO, number of game played, ...). As the difference between a mistake and a kingmaking action is very tight, one kingmaking report is not enough to find a player guilty: only players who regularly play against their interest should be found guilty. -1 to -10 reputation penalty. Moderators should warn the player that this is a only small warning. Relapses can lead to higher reputation points penalties.
Bug exploit Exploit a known bug during a game The bug must have been reported in the forum, and an exact reference to this bug must be in the report, with the table id and the move number. Minor bugs that can be considered as "variants" are NOT concerned (ex: pick 4 cards instead of 3). Bugs that violate the spirit of the game are concerned. No penalty applies: if there is a bug that has been widely used for a game, a global ELO reset (or an ELO adjustment for players who exploited the bug) will be done.
Donnée 1A Donnée 3A Donnée 3B Donnée 3C
Donnée 1A Donnée 3A Donnée 3B Donnée 3C
Donnée 1A Donnée 3A Donnée 3B Donnée 3C
Donnée 1A Donnée 3A Donnée 3B Donnée 3C